top of page

Milei Wins Argentine Elections, but Economic and Political Realities Undermine Radical Aims

Javier Milei's recent electoral triumph in Argentina marks a significant shift in a trend sweeping across Latin America. Fueled by discontent over stagnant living standards, corruption, and rising crime, voters are rejecting established incumbents in favor of radical insurgents. Milei's victory, with a 12-point lead over the center-left Peronist government, defied pollsters' predictions and represents a turning point in Argentina's political landscape.


Milei's insurgent party, La Libertad Avanza, won by securing 55.7% of the vote, making him the first candidate since 1983 to achieve such a mandate in a run-off election. His promises include privatizing the state oil company, public television, radio, and news agencies. While he remains tight-lipped about specific economic plans, the rumor mill suggests that dollarization and the elimination of the Central Bank may be more long-term projects than immediate policy proposals.


Noises out of the Camp Right After the Election: In the aftermath of his victory, Milei wasted no time in signaling his intent to reshape Argentina. He pledged to privatize key state assets, indicating a departure from the status quo. His olive branch to political leaders and those willing to join the "new Argentina" underscores a potential shift in political dynamics.


While Milei's radicalism resonates with a segment of the population, governing effectively poses challenges. La Libertad Avanza holds only 39 seats in the lower house out of 257, requiring Milei to navigate alliances across the political spectrum for legislative support. Former president Mauricio Macri's support may be pivotal, but analysts emphasize the need for broader cooperation.


The fragmented political landscape and Milei's limited executive experience cast shadows on the feasibility of major reforms. A lack of congressional majority, short honeymoon period, and rising unemployment could hinder the implementatability of radical proposals like closing down the central bank or replacing the peso with the US dollar, at least in the short term.


Despite the challenges, Milei's win is viewed positively by markets, leading to a 5% rise in Argentina's dollar bonds. Privatization plans, if executed, may attract investor interest. However, achieving tangible economic results will depend on navigating complexities, including potential inflation concerns and debt renegotiations.


Three potential policy paths emerge for Milei's government: institutional conflict akin to with Petro in Colombia, pro-market moderation reflecting former preident Mauricio Macri's influence, or an all-encompassing austerity agenda. In the first case, Milei leans into his social conservatism and burns political capital on fringe issues, making things like pasing budgets extremely difficult and eroding his ability to do anything that requires actual legislation - ie most major policy items on his wish list. Like Boric in Chile and Petro in Colombia radical societal restructuring schemes will collapse into inter-institutional conflict and the chaos will create more noise and little tangible bennefit for the privace sector.


In the second case, Macri positions his ideas and people at the heart of the new administration - whatch the influntial finance minister and cheif of staff posts to guage whether this is happening. In such a case Milei is able to broker an electoral pact that incldudes the traditional right and the pro-business center to deliver economic policy that looks like the last conservative administration: privitiziation, pro-trade and business reforms, and better adeherence to IMF conditionality.


Finally, Milei could make good on his promise to 'chain saw' the budget deficit. Through institutional maneuvering or the failure to propose a budget that forces stopgap spending at fixed levelels. Decreases to public spending, while narrowly useful for getting debt growth undercontrol, will be imediatley painful for the average Argentine, will unemployment spiking as state employees are les go by the tens of thousands. Unwiding the web of price caps and subsidies used to, poorly, keep a lid on inflation without stabalization will cause inflation to progress even further. The macroeconomic bennefits of such policies is in the long run, with the short term hits to economic activity likley pushing debt ratios up with a denominator effect before deficit stabalization and business investment recovered.


While the third scenerio is the most likley given the current institutional restraints, a moderate path of mid-to-high single didget spending cuts leading to generalized pain while non-consumer exposed businesses bennefit from a boost to confidence and investment. Even such moderate policies though are certain to generate the type of painful hit to the real economy that kept Macri as a one term president and can sew the seeds of decline for any structural economic reform package.


As Milei takes office, Argentina faces a delicate balancing act. While the market responds positively, concerns linger about economic collapse, hyperinflation, and the sustainability of debt agreements. In office, the self style 'anacro-capitalist's' ability to forge alliances, make pragmatic policy decisions, and navigate economic challenges will determine whether his radicalism brings about meaningful change or succumbs to the harsh realities of governing a broken economy.

Commentaires


bottom of page